28th
November
2007
- Google put out a new version of their Mobile Maps app that does a cool thing. It’ll give approximate location based on cell location, even without a GPS. I played with it on the way home today and it does a decent job. As good as I could expect given how it’s doing it, anyway. It doesn’t have the accuracy of GPS location, but it’s great for keeping the map on the area you’re in, not to mention saving you from having to search around to get the map to where you are initially.
- Speaking of which, Google has added collaborative features to their web maps system.
- So, Katee Sackhoff may be departing Bionic Woman? Bad news, as she and Miguel Ferrer were the highlights of the show. I still have very mixed reactions about the show, and won’t be all too crushed if it doesn’t survive the strike should Sackhoff no longer be on it.
- The legendary Todd-AO Scoring Stages are being shut down. OK, so I suppose it’s not as legendary to those of you who aren’t film score nerds like me…
- Looking to get into the housing market? Might wanna consider current trends.
- Add MORE reviews I’m not behind on: No Country For Old Men (9), Mr. Magorium’s Wonder Emporium (9), Enchanted (7), Bee Movie (3) & Saw IV (3). Good grief.
Dialog Of The Day: “The Pie Maker considered how not telling Chuck the truth about her father was a lot like being locked in a prison. Then he considered how being locked in a prison was actually much worse than some silly metaphor about truth.” (The Narrator in Pushing Daisies 1.08)
Yeah, I haven’t done a Dialog Of The Day in quite some time (I do have plans for the return of the feature in a better form, I swear), but I couldn’t resist this one from today’s Pushing Daisies. Have I mentioned how much I love this show? 
posted in Ponderings |
14th
November
2007
Poor Jessica Alba. Poor, poor Jessica Alba. Try as she might to save this dog of a film, she can’t quite pull it off.
Writing: This comedy falls flat in between some of the clever notions it presents. Frankly, it’s a movie that should work, and the fact that it doesn’t really says something. Just like the recent The Heartbreak Kid, this movie is buried under severely out of place explicit sequences. While it might not be quite as bad as The Heartbreak Kid at it, the end result is the same. I’m all for mixing genre and style, but trying to bury these sweet natured stories amidst soft-core porn productions simply doesn’t mesh. At all.
Production: Can’t recall anything either particularly good or bad to comment on.
Cast: Like I said, Jessica Alba’s performance and her character are absolutely lost amidst the rest of this film. Again, I can equate it to The Heartbreak Kid, where the fantastic Michelle Monaghan was also unable to save the otherwise disaster of a film. Oh, and I will say that Lonny Ross (who plays Josh on 30 Rock) was a nice touch to play the brother for Alba’s character. Though with his small amount of material, he can’t do a whole lot to save the film, either. Dane Cook is unmemorable in pretty much every way. And Dan Fogler, who I liked in Balls Of Fury, can’t manage to make his debased best friend character work (a tired genre staple).
Music: I have zero memory of anything having to do with Aaron Zigman’s score. He is a talented composer, so I’ll just go on the assumption that it was a decent enough score since I don’t remember particularly disliking it or anything.
posted in Movie Reviews |
12th
November
2007
As some of you may know, I made the jump to the HD formats a few months ago. I did so via Blu-Ray & HD-DVD drives for the PC. Lacking HDCP encryption support on both my HD monitor and my front projector, I was forced to turn to SlySoft’s AnyDVD HD application to be able to even watch the discs I legally purchase on equipment fully capable of playing them back, if not for the lack of HDCP encryption crap (HDCP is evil, and another reason for my dislike of Intel). From the beginning, the format war has been an annoyance to me. I’ve always been of the opinion that I didn’t really care which one won, as long as one of them did so sooner rather than later (which is looking highly unlikely). To choose a side, I had been a backer of Blu-Ray, due almost solely to the studio/industry backing of the format. HD-DVD has smacked of desperation from the start, and in a Darwinian way has always felt like the pending loser (then again, since when does a Sony format EVER win?). While I may like a few tidbits of tech spec better for Blu-Ray, the two formats are for the most part a wash. That was until I spent a few months learning all there is to know about the encryption and restrictions of the two formats first hand. And let me be clear about this after having experienced them these few months - from a consumer standpoint, Blu-Ray is downright evil in comparison to HD-DVD. Microsoft (of all people) weren’t kidding when they were touting the consumer friendliness of HD-DVD back during the launch. It’s absolutely true. Blu-Ray goes that extra mile to alienate the customer in almost every possible way in terms of policy and restriction. There’s nothing, and I mean NOTHING, about the format that was designed with the viewer in mind. That’s not to say HD-DVD is perfect (it has AACS/HDCP restrictions as well). While I know that the money from the industry is key to the design of these specs, Blu-Ray’s obvious design towards the paranoia of the studios is without doubt. Blu-Ray recently launched their highly-touted BD+ encryption protection system, which is something unique to the format above and beyond what HD-DVD can do to lock down content. The fine folks as SlySoft promised they’d nail BD+ within the year, and they have already done so. I kid you not. I can happily play back Fantastic Four 2 and other BD+ discs using AnyDVD HD. It’s a fantastic app (if a bit overpriced) made by developers who really know what they are doing. It goes to show that these guys will be able to hack their way around anything to enable consumers. But that doesn’t stop apps like CyberLink’s PowerDVD app (the ONLY current choice for good HD playback for computers, sadly) from putting in positively retarded restrictions into their newest builds recently, such as the fact that it will no longer play Blu-Ray discs that aren’t AACS encrypted (which is what AnyDVD unlocks to get around HDCP requirements) because AACS encryption is actually REQUIRED to be on every commercial Blu-Ray disc. Never mind BD+, region coding and the other aspects of Blu-Ray over HD-DVD. So, as of this moment, I’m changing my vote for who I wish to see win this war. I’m now an HD-DVD supporter. Given the choice on Warner Bros titles (the last of the major studios to support both formats), I will now start getting the HD-DVD version (unless it’s a DVD/HD-DVD combo disc - which is a topic I won’t rant on right now). Paramount annoyed me a little while ago when they changed from supporting both formats to just HD-DVD (after being bribed to do so), but I no longer care (BTW, I think Paramount does some of the nicest HD disc releases of any of the studios). Frankly, more exclusive support might finally put an end to this mess. It’ll be interesting to see if Warner choses a side after the Christmas season. I think it’s unfair to those with a player for just one of the formats as well, but since I can do either, that fact doesn’t really matter to me. I know a number of people that won’t touch the HD formats until there’s either a clear winner or all the players do either. And I don’t blame them one bit. I still think that HD-DVD will be the likely loser (all of Toshiba’s moves of pure desperation make it seem like a fire sale), but do to their far more consumer-minded spec, they officially have my support as of now. Actually, if you want some amusement on all this, read this change log for the most recent build of AnyDVD HD.
posted in Technology |
12th
November
2007
Just popping in briefly to say that I haven’t dropped off the face of the Earth. Having a tech problem with the blog, which this time is completely my fault. After playing with a couple components, I’ve screwed up a couple minor things (like posting pictures in blog posts), that I just got squared away. So, now I’ve gotta finish off the handful of movie review posts I’ve got mostly finished and get ‘em all posted. They’ll show up within the next day or two, depending on available time. Gonna be at the Battlestar Galactica: Razor screening tomorrow night, so the posts might not start showing up till Tuesday…
posted in General |
5th
November
2007
A fantastic character thriller filled with excellent performances and a great script.
Writing: This is one of those marvelous morality tales where pretty much everyone exists at one level of gray or another. When described as a miracle worker, the character of Michael Clayton quickly shuns the accolade and instead describes himself as a janitor. And in most ways, he’s not just being modest. While he may be very good at his job, it really does come down to being little more than that in the grand scheme of things. Nobody thinks of him unless they need him, and after the fact they’d probably rather forget about anything having to do with him. As such, he’s a very ambiguous character, eeking his way through his meandering life, unsure of almost everything. And as much as he may seem to have his act together, he’s hanging on by little more than all those he helps. If they only knew. The journey of the character(s) is fascinating.
Production: Favoring the simple over the flashy (which is in character with the story), the production exists in the world of high stakes class action lawsuits and Fortune 500 power grabbers, but doesn’t stoop to glorifying their world or making it overly flashy. It’s a dog-eat-dog atmosphere, and the crew brings it to life with a great combination of cinematography, set design, location scouting and comfortable editing.
Cast: Here is another strong suit of the film. Clooney is 100% on the money with his performance. It’s tweaked to perfection, nailing all the details with subtlety. He portrays all the frustration of being a fish trapped in a current without overplaying any kind of anxiety or melodrama. It wouldn’t surprise me if Clooney manages to get himself a nomination for the role, and I’d be happy to see it happen. Tilda Swinton is intriguing as the up-and-coming corporate spin-controller, who’s in over her head and compounds her problems with one worse choice on top of each bad choice, slowly losing control. Sydney Pollack is an obvious casting move as the semi-soulless boss, and is also the correct choice. Then there’s Tom Wilkinson who is always able to walk that fine line of slick power and unglued mania, and does so with ease in this film. Another acting bonus is Merritt Wever in a supporting role. She was great as PA Suzanne in Studio 60, and pulls off the character of naive intelligence very well.
Music: James Newton Howard downplays the score but makes it work very well. He avoids anything particularly flashy or even thematic and goes more for atmosphere, texture and ambiance. Not a score to rave about, but definitely a solid, deserving effort.
posted in Movie Reviews |
4th
November
2007
This remake makes a number of mistakes, not the least of which is being directed by the Farrelly brothers. I don’t think I’ve seen the original version, but I have to imagine it works better than this remake.
Writing: The single biggest mistake in this film is the extremely crude material that feels COMPLETELY out of place. It just doesn’t work at all. It feels like being dirty and nasty just to be dirty and nasty. As much as they might be trying for humor, it just falls flat on its face, making a very loud, metallic thud in the process. I can’t stress how much this destroys this movie, which to be honest might have been able to otherwise work.
Production: The location filming does add something to the feel of the movie, but for the most part the production of the film is pretty pedestrian and average for the comedy genre.
Cast: As if wasting Ben Stiller wasn’t bad enough, poor Michelle Monaghan is absolutely neglected. Frankly, she’s the best thing about this film, but awash in the midst of all the rest of the story and characters, there’s just no way she can save things. And that’s a shame, cause she’s quickly shot up to being one of my favorite actresses, and all I could do was pity her amidst this mess of a film. She’s really trying, but has almost nothing worthwhile to play against. Actress Malin Akerman gets saddled with absolutely horrible material, so it’s almost impossible to judge her performance. It sucks, but it’s likely the fault of what they gave her to work with. Jerry Stiller certainly doesn’t help the film, and in all honesty probably does more to hurt it.
Music: Bill & Brendan Ryan are credited with the score. I’m not only completely unfamiliar with them by name, but I don’t recall the music score in this film whatsoever. So, I can make no comment. It must have been average enough if I don’t remember at least somewhat liking or disliking it.
posted in Movie Reviews |